E-Bodies.org Cuda Challenger Forum

Technical Shop => Engine, Transmission & Rear End => Topic started by: Daveh on February 03, 2017, 06:38:04 AM

Title: 4 Hole Plenum VS. Open Plenum Question
Post by: Daveh on February 03, 2017, 06:38:04 AM
Hi Guys,

I ordered some spacers for my small block MOPAR and instead of the open plenum I accidently ordered the 4 hole (See Attached). It's a street engine with an Edelbrock Thunder series 650 carb with a performer intake.  I'm trying to achieve the proper height because they are going on my 71 Challenger with a Shaker hood. Because of their price I want to try to make the correct decision first because if I experiment then I can't return them.


The main question - Will I notice a difference if I use them or should I send them back and get the one hole? Returning them is no problem they told me they will just exchange them. What are your thoughts? Thanks

Dave

Title: Re: 4 Hole Plenum VS. Open Plenum Question
Post by: Brads70 on February 03, 2017, 06:42:03 AM
My thoughts are... I'd go with the open one so I don't have to worry about a throttle blade hanging up and keeping the throttle wide open. People often remove part of the divider for more top end anyhow. 
Title: Re: 4 Hole Plenum VS. Open Plenum Question
Post by: Cuda Cody on February 03, 2017, 08:27:31 AM
Maybe @Chryco Psycho (http://forum.e-bodies.org/index.php?action=profile;u=4)  has some experience with this, but I too would opt for the open one in your situation.  But not 100% sure.   :notsure:
Title: Re: 4 Hole Plenum VS. Open Plenum Question
Post by: 303 Mopar on February 03, 2017, 08:39:18 AM
 :iagree:  Your best bet is going with open, but I doubt you will see any major difference in performance since your intake is already dual-plane.
Title: Re: 4 Hole Plenum VS. Open Plenum Question
Post by: Daveh on February 03, 2017, 09:53:58 AM
I just dropped them in the mail to return them for the open plenum spacers.  Thanks guys. 
Title: Re: 4 Hole Plenum VS. Open Plenum Question
Post by: HP_Cuda on February 03, 2017, 09:55:18 AM

Definitely the open plenum, no need to restrict or hang up on anything.

If this was the case you would also use the 4 hole gasket too!  :D
Title: 4 Hole Plenum VS. Open Plenum Question
Post by: GoodysGotaCuda on February 03, 2017, 01:39:24 PM
Edelbrock clearly recommends the FOUR HOLE style spacer in their carb documentation for low/mid torque and throttle response.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170203/a9a546f9a293c8ead30bc14a719f80de.jpg)
Title: Re: 4 Hole Plenum VS. Open Plenum Question
Post by: RUNCHARGER on February 03, 2017, 02:54:14 PM
Divided plenum manifold? Yes I think I would have kept the 4 hole.

Sheldon
Title: Re: 4 Hole Plenum VS. Open Plenum Question
Post by: HP_Cuda on February 03, 2017, 03:21:52 PM

Maybe the problem begins with using an Edelbrock carburetor?
Title: Re: 4 Hole Plenum VS. Open Plenum Question
Post by: Chryco Psycho on February 03, 2017, 07:39:37 PM
basically the open spacer will work better in a situation where the engine is under carbed this will allow all four barrels to feed any given cylinder
the 4 hole increases signal to any one venturi & will improve response which helps if the engine is over carbed
a 650 cfm carb is n the small side for any engine except the 318 so the open spacer would be my choice  :alan2cents:
Title: Re: 4 Hole Plenum VS. Open Plenum Question
Post by: Cudakiller70 on February 03, 2017, 08:21:00 PM
I went with the 4 hole, reading better signal for street. My thinking was if I didn't like it I could cut it open.