E-Bodies.org Cuda Challenger Forum

Technical Shop => Engine, Transmission & Rear End => Topic started by: GoodysGotaCuda on July 13, 2019, 05:00:36 PM

Title: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: GoodysGotaCuda on July 13, 2019, 05:00:36 PM
We are going to start tearing down my 1976 Warlock for some refreshing and I would like to poll those here familiar with stroking a 360.

General needs
Reusing - Performer RPM intake
Reusing - 2.02 valve Jheads, milled, stock ports, 63cc chambers
Keep - exhaust manifolds

Who's kit should I look at for the bottom end? Ring, bearing recommendations?

It's been 15 years since I've been in the bottom end of a small block, any other recommendations would be appreciated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: 1 Wild R/T on July 13, 2019, 05:51:52 PM
Leave your original 360 in the Warlock & build a roller block....  They are still common & cheap & a easy way to add a roller cam....
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: RUNCHARGER on July 13, 2019, 06:39:01 PM
I'd be tempted to find some 92 318 Magnum exhaust manifolds. And yeah, use a roller block.
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: jimynick on July 13, 2019, 07:19:24 PM
I'm kinda straddling both schools of thought. I got a roller Magnum block for the hydraulic Lunati roller cam and 4" crank, but am using LA style aluminum heads and an off-shore AirGap intake in the LA bolt pattern. It's headers all the way for me; that's if I EVER get my son's 347 Mustang out of my garage! Good luck with it!  :bigthumb:
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: autoxcuda on July 13, 2019, 07:32:08 PM
Scat cast crank kit

9.0 to 9.5:1 compression

Something between a comp XE268 and XE275 with 110-112 centerline. Lunati has similar cam in that range.

If it's more of a tow and cruiser, steer toward the smaller cam.

Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: 1 Wild R/T on July 13, 2019, 07:51:39 PM
Quote from: autoxcuda on July 13, 2019, 07:32:08 PM
Scat cast crank kit

Curious why you'd go with a cast crank kit?  I'd drop the extra $350 for a forged crank every time...
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: autoxcuda on July 13, 2019, 08:20:52 PM
Quote from: 1 Wild R/T on July 13, 2019, 07:51:39 PM
Quote from: autoxcuda on July 13, 2019, 07:32:08 PM
Scat cast crank kit

Curious why you'd go with a cast crank kit?  I'd drop the extra $350 for a forged crank every time...

Scat cast cranks have fillet radius' that stock forged don't have. They are proven to 550 hp.

I don't think he's after anywhere near that HP.

If you do grow the shortblock over 550 hp, he'll have different heads, and different compression (pistons).

Good thing, if he really has 63 cc on those J-heads, that is what most the aftermarket heads all come in at. So possibly he could use that shortblock for bigger HP builds.

Depends on his budget and what realistically could happen in the future.
Title: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: GoodysGotaCuda on July 14, 2019, 03:54:10 AM
Thanks for the feedback, I'll check out the Scat kits.

The budget is pretty low for this one and so are the expectations, I'm not building a high horsepower/fast truck with this one. Just enough scoot to be entertaining, pull a trailer and get my wife into trouble [her truck].

I'd like to reuse the LA top end I have and make the best of it. I won't need any more than a cast crank for this one, the 'Cuda is a different story. [emoji106]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: RUNCHARGER on July 14, 2019, 07:51:56 AM
The plan is good for a truck. The lowend grunt will be a noticeable improvement.
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: bennydodge on July 14, 2019, 08:56:14 AM
Cast crank will be fine I think. I've been using a 4" mopar crank for 16 years with track use every year along with street abuse and cruising. Stock 340 cam is what I'd use with your setup-trouble free and proven.   
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: RUNCHARGER on July 14, 2019, 09:21:54 AM
Wasn't there an issue with one of the cast cranks breaking a few years ago? Maybe they were Eagle brand?
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: 1 Wild R/T on July 14, 2019, 09:38:11 AM
Quote from: RUNCHARGER on July 14, 2019, 09:21:54 AM
Wasn't there an issue with one of the cast cranks breaking a few years ago? Maybe they were Eagle brand?

That what I remember...  I thought it was whoever makes the Mopar cranks...
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: bennydodge on July 14, 2019, 09:46:29 AM
Quote from: 1 Wild R/T on July 14, 2019, 09:38:11 AM
Quote from: RUNCHARGER on July 14, 2019, 09:21:54 AM
Wasn't there an issue with one of the cast cranks breaking a few years ago? Maybe they were Eagle brand?

That what I remember...  I thought it was whoever makes the Mopar cranks...
May very well have been. Buddy of mine has the same 4" cast crank as mine for ten years trouble free. Guess we just got lucky....No doubt, though, that forged is better.
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: RUNCHARGER on July 14, 2019, 10:03:25 AM
OP's application should be fine I'm sure though. Although you have to consider the cost of balancing vs. forged.
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: 1 Wild R/T on July 14, 2019, 10:17:25 AM
Back in the 2000-2005 time frame I saw postings of at least seven 408 cast cranks breaking... But since then I haven't heard of any more...
Was there a casting flaw? Was it an assembly error? As Steve mentioned the cast crank uses radiused fillets, if the builder used a standard radius bearing it could overload the crank... (assuming the crank would even rotate)
I guess I just prefer to trust a forging in spite of the casting likely being fine for the application...
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: bennydodge on July 14, 2019, 10:34:42 AM
Quote from: 1 Wild R/T on July 14, 2019, 10:17:25 AM
Back in the 2000-2005 time frame I saw postings of at least seven 408 cast cranks breaking... But since then I haven't heard of any more...
Was there a casting flaw? Was it an assembly error? As Steve mentioned the cast crank uses radiused fillets, if the builder used a standard radius bearing it could overload the crank... (assuming the crank would even rotate)
I guess I just prefer to trust a forging in spite of the casting likely being fine for the application...
Interesting for sure. I built my engine around 2003-ish and it does have the rolled or radiused style. For the record, once you get up high in the 500 horse range it's wise to go forged..
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: bennydodge on July 14, 2019, 10:54:32 AM
By the way, those Warlock's are damn cool rigs. Got any pics?
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: autoxcuda on July 14, 2019, 10:26:04 PM
Quote from: 1 Wild R/T on July 14, 2019, 09:38:11 AM
Quote from: RUNCHARGER on July 14, 2019, 09:21:54 AM
Wasn't there an issue with one of the cast cranks breaking a few years ago? Maybe they were Eagle brand?

That what I remember...  I thought it was whoever makes the Mopar cranks...

Eagle

...and

Eagle

The Scat cranks are a different story.

Also, save some $$$ and buy a Scat balanced kit. They are internally balanced so they take a regular 340 balancer. They come with Kings bearings for the radius.

I bought mine from Brian at IMM Engines. He said he's checked the balanced and they are fine.

I've talked to Scat at SEMA and they balance in house at their Redondo Beach facility.

I got the I-beam rods and didn't have to notch the block. With the lighter aftermarket pistons and rods it revs surprisingly very quickly.

Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: 1 Wild R/T on July 14, 2019, 10:59:36 PM
Quote from: autoxcuda on July 14, 2019, 10:26:04 PM
Quote from: 1 Wild R/T on July 14, 2019, 09:38:11 AM
Quote from: RUNCHARGER on July 14, 2019, 09:21:54 AM
Wasn't there an issue with one of the cast cranks breaking a few years ago? Maybe they were Eagle brand?

That what I remember...  I thought it was whoever makes the Mopar cranks...

Eagle

...and

Eagle

The Scat cranks are a different story.

Also, same some $$$ and buy a Scat balanced kit. They are internally balanced so they take a regular 340 balancer. They come with Kings bearings for the radius.

I bought mine from Brian at IMM Engines. He said he's checked the balanced and they are fine.

I've talked to Scat at SEMA and they balance in house at their Redondo Beach facility.

I got the I-beam rods and didn't have to notch the block. With the lighter aftermarket pistons and rods it revs surprisingly very quickly.

Good Info, thanks for the input Steve..
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: autoxcuda on July 15, 2019, 09:28:16 AM
If he's going from a 360 to a 408 internal balance he'll need:

New/different balancer

Spacer or something for crank pulley

Remove torque converter weights

Anything else? 
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: bennydodge on July 15, 2019, 09:47:04 AM
When I went from a 340 to a 416 my cast crank setup was internally balanced and I was able to use my stock crank pulley (73 340). I think it was a BHJ neutral balance dampener. I also swapped my converter to a zero balance PTC unit. On my buddy's stroker we just chiseled the weights off a stock converter and that worked also.
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: gzig5 on July 15, 2019, 12:07:46 PM
Quote from: autoxcuda on July 15, 2019, 09:28:16 AM
If he's going from a 360 to a 408 internal balance he'll need:

New/different balancer

Spacer or something for crank pulley

Remove torque converter weights

Anything else?

New tires to take the abuse that is about to be dished out.

:burnout:
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: Chryco Psycho on July 15, 2019, 08:49:01 PM
Intake is good
I would use 308 swirl heads from 87-92 360s as my first choice
I would use magnum exhaust manfolds , there are better & worse years so do the research .
I would definately use a forged crank stroker
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: autoxcuda on July 16, 2019, 06:16:26 AM
Quote from: Chryco Psycho on July 15, 2019, 08:49:01 PM
Intake is good
I would use 308 swirl heads from 87-92 360s as my first choice
I would use magnum exhaust manfolds , there are better & worse years so do the research .
I would definately use a forged crank stroker

What are the cc's of the 308's? If they aren't the same as aftermarket heads, he'll have to change pistons and rebalance for any other head changes.
Title: Re: Planning for my Warlock - Basic LA 408 Stroker
Post by: Chryco Psycho on July 16, 2019, 06:27:44 AM
I will have to look up the head CC , they are the same as any LA head but are good for about a 40 hp gain over X or J castings