Main Menu

Does Being an "Orphan" Affect Value?

Started by floorit426, August 24, 2019, 07:52:50 AM

Previous topic Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

floorit426

Once Chrysler killed off the Plymouth Division, did that affect the value of Plymouths, either way?

RUNCHARGER

Nope: Pontiac is gone, Oldsmobile is gone, Duesenberg is gone etc.
Sheldon

7E-Bodies

And if I'm not mistaken, I'd say Cudas are going for better money than comparably equipped Challengers.
1970 Challenger R/T Numbers Matching 440 Auto in F8 Quad Green


JS29

They made more Dodge E-Body's than Plymouth's. 

70 Challenger Lover

I think production numbers are the biggest variable between Cudas and Challengers. Both styles are equally killer looking. When you get into the 72-74 years, I think most people give the Cuda the styling edge though.

JS29


Hemi1632

Quote from: 7E-Bodies on August 24, 2019, 10:45:29 AM
And if I'm not mistaken, I'd say Cudas are going for better money than comparably equipped Challengers.

I agree, especially with the 72-74 model years. I have a Challenger and am looking for a Barracuda, and I have noticed that if the years, options and condition are similar the Cuda's seam to sell for 3-5k more.


Hemi1632

Quote from: 70 Challenger Lover on August 24, 2019, 11:21:03 AM
I think production numbers are the biggest variable between Cudas and Challengers. Both styles are equally killer looking. When you get into the 72-74 years, I think most people give the Cuda the styling edge though.

I know I am in the minority, but I love the way the frowning face Challengers look!

70 Challenger Lover

Quote from: Hemi1632 on August 24, 2019, 11:43:32 AM
Quote from: 70 Challenger Lover on August 24, 2019, 11:21:03 AM
I think production numbers are the biggest variable between Cudas and Challengers. Both styles are equally killer looking. When you get into the 72-74 years, I think most people give the Cuda the styling edge though.

I know I am in the minority, but I love the way the frowning face Challengers look!

I love the front grille area of the 72-74 Challengers. It's the tail light panel I don't like.

Archialfa

Quote from: 70 Challenger Lover on August 24, 2019, 11:21:03 AM
I think production numbers are the biggest variable between Cudas and Challengers. Both styles are equally killer looking. When you get into the 72-74 years, I think most people give the Cuda the styling edge though.

Couldn't agree more. When I was looking for an E-body to buy it was either 70-71 Challenger or any Cuda except 71 (don't like the grille).

72-74 Challengers look lame with the funny mask and tail lights. They made an awesome car look like an afterthought.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Plum Crazy 1970 Challenger 440 Magnum

73TopBanana

look lame? Why don't you join a forum for 70-71 E bodies only?


Archialfa

Quote from: 73TopBanana on August 26, 2019, 06:35:54 AM
look lame? Why don't you join a forum for 70-71 E bodies only?

...and don't forget 70, 72-74 Cudas!  :) :) :)
Plum Crazy 1970 Challenger 440 Magnum

73TopBanana

guess you didn't understand my response

72 Challenger

The idea of orphaned cars is an argument that I think does not stand. It comes down to production numbers  (aka rarity) then desirability, which can go up or down. 

Plymouth Superbird < Dodge Daytona, they produced more Birds. That's a loss for Plymouth
Dodge Challenger< Plymouth Cuda, they produced more Challengers. That's a loss for Dodge.
Someday I will have a J0b.

floorit426

I guess I compare it to the way the Desoto was regarded, within a decade of it's demise. Or, LaSalle, Kaiser, and Edsel, for that matter. All, seem to have been forgotten.