How many of this combination was produced?

[Bobbydodge]

Can anybody tell how many of this car was made? Like 1 of 500 ect

Y05  26 En29
N41 N42 N85 R35 V9W
C55 G33 H51 M21 M25 M31
V1W A01 A62 B51 C16 C26
EK2 HRX9 000 829 034119
E63 D32 Js29 N0B 111460

[750-h2]

The only known breakdown goes by model, engine and transmission. In your case there were 2,076 1970 Challenger R/T SE 383 4bl with the automatic transmission. Of those approx. 4.5 percent were painted EK2.

[3.0CSL]

Any idea how many 70 R/TSE 383 Magnum autos were Plum Crazy ?

[anlauto]

FC7 was THEmost popular colour 

[71383bee]

Can anybody tell how many of this car was made? Like 1 of 500 ect

Y05  26 En29
N41 N42 N85 R35 V9W
C55 G33 H51 M21 M25 M31
V1W A01 A62 B51 C16 C26
EK2 HRX9 000 829 034119
E63 D32 Js29 N0B 111460

Man....that's a sweet RT/SE.  If had D21 it would be one of my bucket list mopar's right there.  I love RT/SE's in orange or K5! 

[3.0CSL]

Surprised how popular the dark burnt orange colour was in 1970 ( the second most popular colour ) it's know as " Ginger " here in Blighty, Personally, really don't like it at all. It does nothing to enhance the gorgeous shape of the Challenger.

[FJ6TA]

Any break downs of T/A's? interested in FJ6 Green Go numbers

Thanks

[anlauto]

You can see FJ6 is pretty low on overall Challenger production, so as a very basic guide line you can take that percentage and do the math on the total T/A production to come up with a basic estimate.

The guy that runs the AAR registry publicly shares all types of information like the amount of FJ6 AAR's KNOWN to exist, 

UNFORTUNETLY the guy   that runs the Challenger T/A registry does not share any information.

[autoxcuda]

The only known breakdown goes by model, engine and transmission. In your case there were 2,076 1970 Challenger R/T SE 383 4bl with the automatic transmission. Of all 3,741 RT/SE's approx. 7.5 percent were painted EK2.

The 7.5% color breakdown is of ALL RT/SE's; all motors and transmission. By the chart Alan posted that's 281 cars

[6bblgt]

Any break downs of T/A's? interested in FJ6 Green Go numbers

Thanks

the vast majority of the FJ6 & FM3 Challengers (JH23) on the above chart are going to be T/As (spring '70 introduction high-impact colors & spring introduction specialty car)

for the data I have organized  - this is also skewed by the collectability/popularity of cars over the past 50 years
          36 T/As & 1 Challenger in FJ6 (1/318)
          59  T/As & 8 Challengers in FM3 (1/198, 5/318, 2/340)

[6bblgt]

You can see FJ6 is pretty low on overall Challenger production, so as a very basic guide line you can take that percentage and do the math on the total T/A production to come up with a basic estimate.

you can NOT take liberties with the info that has survived from Chrysler    by your "very basic guide line": 2400 (JH23J0Bs) x .004 (FJ6) = 9.6 T/As painted FJ6 (US spec) 

there is INCLUDED ERROR already present in the numbers - presenting/manipulating them outside of their intended purpose introduces HUGE ERROR

[RUNCHARGER]

Yes: It's really almost conjecture. I know of a fellow with a Hemi car of which there are thought to be 2 in the world. His is number 3 for sure and who knows if there are more.

[anlauto]

You can see FJ6 is pretty low on overall Challenger production, so as a very basic guide line you can take that percentage and do the math on the total T/A production to come up with a basic estimate.

you can NOT take liberties with the info that has survived from Chrysler    by your "very basic guide line": 2400 (JH23J0Bs) x .004 (FJ6) = 9.6 T/As painted FJ6 (US spec) 

there is INCLUDED ERROR already present in the numbers - presenting/manipulating them outside of their intended purpose introduces HUGE ERROR

I was trying to point it out as a VERY BASIC, giving you an rough ESTIMATE....that's all....I've seen lots of people use this as a guide line....I agree with you 1000% that it's NOT going to be ACCURATE, especially with the rarer colours like FJ6 and FM3.....how does it average with colours like FC7 or FE5 ?

[6bblgt]

l....I've seen lots of people use this as a guide line....

IT IS BAD MATH
IT IS BAD PRACTICE
IT IS INVENTING A NUMBER
IT HAS NO BASIS IN REALITY

"lots of people" did it, do it, will do it - is not a valid argument/defense    they are WRONG .....

[anlauto]

So what are you trying to say Dan ?

You should convince your friend that runs the Challenger T/A registry to make the information of known examples public knowledge, that way nobody would have to use bad math to come up with factious numbers to suit their own curiosity.